Seeing this amusing yet worrying comic got me thinking about
NAPLAN. I've had previously strong views on NAPLAN before this course, however
I found that some of the views presented in this course really challenged me to
think about my views, especially with NAPLAN, differently to what I had
previously.
Firstly I thought about NAPLAN and its objectives and aims,
this national test assesses all students from years 3, 5, 7 and 9 in a broad
variation of questions targeting literacy, numeracy, grammar and reading. As
the NAPLAN website, (2013) states specifically about their writing task that
addresses a literacy aspect, “The Writing
task targets the full range of student capabilities expected of students from
Years 3 to 9. The same stimulus is used for students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9….
The same marking guide is used to assess all students' writing, allowing for a
national comparison”. The element of having all students across the board
doing the same test, regardless of age, the results gained from NAPLAN being
graded not by what different levels of knowledge students should have reached
at different points of their schooling, but in general, assessing what they can
remember and how they perform on one specific day infuriates me. How can one
test with the exact same content and questions be the appropriate measure for
students ranging from these wide assortment of ages. I feel that this element
puts so much pressure on teachers to not only have to teach to the stupidity of
this tests' structure, but then what happens if a teacher let’s say teaches a
year 3 class this year and next year she is put on to a year 5 class. Does she
teach the exact same content the exact same way in which she did the year
before with students that were 2 years younger?
Ford, (2013) also states her opinion on the issue, with her
focus more specifically on the cultural gap and its effect on students with
reference to the NAPLAN test, which is another element of this test that I
believe is a monumental negative,
"Since the introduction of National Australian Program in Literacy and
Numeracy (NAPLAN) in 2008, results continue to show very poor educational
outcomes for indigenous students, especially in the NT" (pp. 81).
Not
only is there a clear disadvantage for students as a whole, but the cultural
gap she speaks about is becoming an even bigger hole with tests such as this
one. Ladson-Billings, (2004) pin points the issue that I am concerned with the
most, the role of the teacher in this process, "a poor quality curriculum coupled with poor quality instruction,
a poorly prepared teacher, and limited resources add up to poor performance on
so-called objective tests" (pp. 84). Now obviously if a teacher is
ill-prepared they will not succeed in any situation, however I believe that in
this situation and in relation to NAPLAN even a well prepared teacher is and
will very much suffer. The importance of remembering content and not actually
comprehending what they are learning is the main issue here for me, clearly
presented in the comic that lead me to this debate in the first place.
Ford, M. (2013). Achievement gaps in Australia: what NAPLAN
reveals about education inequality in Australia. Race Ethnicity and Education,
16(1), 80-102.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2004). New directions in multicultural
education: Complexities, boundaries, and critical race theory. In Handbook of
Research on Multicultural Education, 2nd ed., ed. J.A. Banks and C.A.M. Banks,
50–65. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
NAPLAN Website. (2013), ‘NAPLAN’, Available from:
http://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/naplan.html
[Accessed on 10th August, 2013]
No comments:
Post a Comment